If you take it out of the theater environment, be sure to pair it with an ALR screen that can absorb stray ambient light, to maintain high contrast. In a dedicated theater or equivalent, though, a good matte screen or maybe even a high contrast gray one – to lower black levels – is the way to go. Speaking of black levels, let’s focus briefly on the Dynamic Iris. It doesn’t push too hard – that is, it says smooth, but doesn’t lower black levels as much on the really dark scenes as their more expensive HT5550 or Epson’s HC5050UB (which is almost 2x the price). Both of those do visibly darker blacks.
Important to note, I don’t think there is currently another under $2K list projector that can do better on those dark scenes, with the Epson HC4010 being very competitive in this area. The BenQ seems to be a little deeper in blacks on 4K content, but the Epson may have a slight edge on 1080p. The point: they are pretty much the two best in this regard, and therefore the two most “home theater” of the $1K - $2K projectors we’ve reviewed in the past year plus. Yes, perhaps the BenQ’s biggest strength is picture quality – especially color. BenQ has often been mentioned here as the DLP company that tends to be most focused on the picture. That’s not to slam the others, but, for example, Optoma – is strong, by my take, in the under $1K range, where their gaming projectors are highly acclaimed.
Since I opened that can of worms: The HT3550 is not a great gaming projector – its input lag is up around 60ms on 1080p content. Word is, it is only a tad faster on 4K content (which we do not measure yet). That makes it, at best, just acceptable for serious gamers, with a lot of them unhappy with that level of lag. That Epson is a better choice for gamers, as I also noted in the HC4010’s summary. I do favor the BenQ HT3550 slightly over the Epson 4010 in terms of typical picture, color-wise, in the sense that in lower brightness scenes (not necessarily very dark ones) I think the DLP BenQ produces slightly richer colors without seeming over the top.
Brightness – we had two HT3550s here. First, a pre-production one (which had several issues – documented in our full review) and a full production model when they started to ship. Brightness was one area that had been very disappointing on the pre-production one. The second HT3550 measured a max of 1,811 lumens – almost 10% below BenQ’s claim, but being short 10% is better than most projectors do when we measure them. Of course, the brightest mode on many projectors is so far off on color as to be used only when ambient light is out of control and you need every last lumen.
For your serious dark room viewing in the best color mode, the BenQ first pre-production unit we had, still had a healthy 994 measured lumens calibrated handling non HDR content, which is just about enough for a typical 150” screen in a proper theater! We also calibrated two more modes for 4K with HDR. One stayed with good old REC709 color gamut that we’ve all been using for “decades,” while the other was calibrated for HDR with P3 color, which the BenQ tries to accomplish – but like every lamp based DLP, came up rather short. Still, what you get is a touch better color with the P3 attempt.
Most of you, I believe will favor sticking with non-P3 for the extra brightness. Please note, the measurements I’m talking about here are from the pre-production unit. The full production model measured over 15% brighter. Sorry, we did not provide our calibration settings because it was obvious that the color tables had changed by full production, so dropping in our settings did not result in better color. No worries though, the production unit’s color was very good compared to most of the competition, without any adjustment.
[sam_pro id=1_47 codes="true"]
